||[Mar. 13th, 2006|05:33 pm]
Man, do I hate writing grant proposals.|
No, the problem with grantwriting is that you have to prove that you're going to be successful in something you've not yet done. This is really bizarre, of course, since in science, we don't know what will happen
If you're reasonably established, you can cheat, by spending a lot of time talking about what you have
done, and how successful it
was. But especially for people writing one of their first (is that true for you, dr_tectonic
?), they totally suck, and you just stare at blank pages saying, "um, I think this is a good idea. Why can't I fill 15 pages with it? Will they hate me if I only write 12? I don't have
10 related publications in my CV! Ack!"
[Or, at least, I
I think this is the second grant proposal I've ever written.
We actually have a leg up, in that we've actually coded a simplified prototype of the model and shown that it gives sensible results, so that's not as heinous.
I'm just agonizing over the "how do I even start this thing" part of it.
My CV doesn't have any related publications...
Don't start at the beginning. From my business report writing days: write the middle, the meaty part, first. Then write the introduction and conclusion, since they're just bookends around the middle. That's the nice part about word processors. ;-)
If I was having trouble writing the middle, I'd do bullet points of key facts, then build a paragraph around them.
I understand they recommend doing essays similarly. Hope this helps.
Good luck. Years down the road, you can look at the blank text of a book chapter and have the same experience...*sigh*