Beemer (dr_tectonic) wrote,

Games: what, how, and why

I'm not sure I've ever pimped Greg Costikyan's essay I Have No Words & I Must Design on game design here on my blog.

It has some really great thoughts on what exactly games are, and on what makes them good. If you have any interest in games, you should read (or re-read) it.

I'll also add the bullet points from a couple posters and talks I've given on why serious games are good for learning:

  • Soft failure: we learn by making mistakes. In a game, you can make mistakes without negative consequences.
  • Topsight: exploring the dynamics of a system by playing with it gives you a holistic understanding of it that is hard to acquire otherwise.
  • Engagement: experiencing a subject in a game is more interesting and involving (i.e., fun) than being told about it in a presentation or text.
  • Practicing Surprise: games can surprise you, and let you practice dealing with the unexpected.

When educational games use these strengths, they can be awesome. When educational games suck (and sadly, they so very frequently do), it's generally because they have failed on one or more of these points. Heck, sometimes regular games fail on these points (or something related) and it causes them to suck.

  • Whoops!

    Just discovered that my Dreamwidth posts haven't been crossposting to LJ since shortly after the pandemic started because I forgot to update my…

  • Milestones

    On Tuesday two weeks ago, I gave the talk that I was scheduled to give a year ago before the conference I was giving it at was cancelled. It's still…

  • Snowpocalypse 21

    It was cloudy and snizzling most of the day Saturday, but the snow didn't really start until Saturday night, and then it kept going all day Sunday.…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded